GSEs To Aggressively Lend A Helping Hand

May 14, 2014 at 9:05 am 1 comment

Whether or not your credit union offers mortgages, you got some good news yesterday.  Former North Carolina Congressman turned head of the Federal Housing Finance Administration Mel Watt used his first major address since taking over in January to signal that Fannie and Freddie will move aggressively to help prop up the U.S. housing market.  Considering that economic gurus as important as Janet Yellen have signaled that continued weakness in the housing market remains a key threat to a sustained economic growth, the fact that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are going to more aggressively try to jump start the housing market even though they are both in conservatorship is big news.

Among the steps announced by Watt are that:

  • The size of mortgage loans that can be purchased by Fannie and Freddie will not be reduced.  He explained that this decision was “motivated by concerns about how such a reduction could adversely impact the health of the current housing finance market.”
  • Fannie and Freddie will increase the circumstances under which they will purchase mortgages that exceed a 43% debt to income ratio.  Keeping in mind that any mortgage that Fannie and Freddie will purchase is considered a qualified mortgage, this has the potential of giving lenders greater underwriting flexibility.
  • Fannie and Freddie will expand the use of more flexible buy back requirements.  This may sound like boring stuff, but Fannie and Freddie have taken such a hard line when it comes to making lenders buy back mortgages with even minor regulatory defects that many lenders have imposed stricter lending requirements than they have to in order to ensure they comply with Fannie and Freddie guidelines.  Remember when it comes to selling mortgages to Fannie and Freddie, it’s seller beware, not buyer beware.
  • Fannie and Freddie will continue to move toward consolidating their securitization platform.  Remember that Fannie and Freddie buy mortgages and then sell them in packages of mortgage-backed securities.  Although we are a long way from finalizing housing reform, all parties seem to agree that whatever entity replaces Fannie and Freddie should be streamlined to avoid needless duplication.

 

As important as the specifics outlined in yesterday’s speech are  is what the change in tone signals about the goals of Fannie and Freddie.  The primary responsibility of the  FHFA is to conserve Fannie and Freddie after they were bailed out by the American taxpayer,  Watt’s predecessor Edward DeMarco emphasized the conservatorship responsibilities of the agency by, for example, resisting pressure from the Administration to loosen lending standards.  Fannie and Freddie have become more not less important to the U.S. housing market in the last five years. 

Critics will argue that yesterday’s speech is yet another example of government not of law but of regulation since the FHFA’s primary goal should be to wind down the GSEs.  Proponents of yesterday’s announcements will argue that with Congress unable to formulate a coherent housing policy, regulators  should use whatever powers they have to get the housing market going again. Both sides have a point and sooner or later, Congress has to come to consensus about what it thinks a “post-Fannie and Freddie” world should look like.

Entry filed under: Compliance, Mortgage Lending, Regulatory. Tags: , , .

When it Comes to Regulation, Should Size Matter? Would Your Credit Union Make These Mistakes?

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Anonymous  |  May 14, 2014 at 10:17 am

    It seems the FHFA is trying to find the balance between ensuring prudent underwriting with allowing lenders the flexibility to provide ample financing to sustain economic growth. They may find the mandates imposed upon lenders by QM are too restrictive and need to be loosened. The test will be how far to lower the underwriting bar without slipping back into irresponsible lending. The theory behind QM sounds great, but it looks like these rules will be trumped by the greater good of reviving the economy. Minimum credit score thresholds have already been lowered with government insured FHA loans. Now the FHFA is rethinking the practicality of the 43% DTI standard. One has to wonder how long it will be when we return to the stated income mortgage…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authored By:

Henry Meier, Esq., Associate General Counsel, New York Credit Union Association

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 345 other followers

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 345 other followers