People of Modest Means and Lots and Lots of Debt

January 15, 2013 at 7:39 am Leave a comment

imagesNo one should be surprised that younger people take on more credit card debt than older people, but a new research paper is getting a lot of attention this morning because of what it says about generational attitudes towards debt, in general, and credit cards in particular.  Specifically, the “estimated difference in pay off rates between generations shows the children’s payoff rate being about  24 percentage points lower than their parents and about 77 percentage points lower than their grandparents.”  Why is this significant?

Because it provides strong evidence that debt taken on by younger generations is becoming a lifetime burden and not simply a reflection of youthful inexperience to be paid off as earnings increase.  Another interesting finding from the study, which is sure to get the attention of the data-driven CFPB,  is that the single biggest motivator to paying down credit card debt is an increase in the minimum payment.  The researchers estimate that for each additional percentage point increase in minimum payoff rate on a credit card increases the average payoff rate by 1.9 percentage points.

There is a debate among economists about whether the country’s current economic malaise reflects the housing binge of the last two decades or more serious structural tension in the American economy.  This is good evidence for underlying structural tensions, folks.  When you take into account the cost of a college education and the absolute necessity for two-income earners in families, more people are committed to managing debt rather than eradicating it.  It seems to me that this trend will continue and that the most successful financial products will be those that emphasize cash flow over debt elimination.

In Search of a One-Handed Economist

Legend has it that former President Harry Truman wanted to find a one-handed economist because all his economist said on the one hand. . .on the other.  Wall Street has been jittery lately trying to figure out how long term a commitment the Treasury has to buying Treasury Bonds to keep mortgage interest rates at historic lows.  The confusion was on full display yesterday.  While Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was in Ann Arbor, Michigan downplaying the risk of inflation and confidently predicting that the bond-buying program would end no time soon, Dennis Lockhart, the President/CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta was giving a speech in which he indicated lukewarm support for continuing the program:  “the 6 1/2 % unemployment rate threshold does not apply to the FMOC Asset Purchase Programs.  The Asset programs are designed to provide a boost to the economy, to put winds in the sails of economic recovery.  For me the decision to continue these programs will be based on ongoing assessments of the benefits and the costs.”

Entry filed under: Economy. Tags: , , , .

Operational Risk Emerging As Major Point Of Examiner Emphasis When Good Intentions, Bad Drafting and Regulatory Zeal Collide

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Authored By:

Henry Meier, Esq., General Counsel, New York Credit Union Association.

The views Henry expresses are Henry’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 503 other followers