Larry Bird For Board President

July 3, 2013 at 8:11 am Leave a comment

imagesA great piece of reporting by the Credit Union Times reveals that although the use and amount of board member compensation varies widely in those states in which it is authorized for state chartered credit unions, some board members receive payouts that could only be described as obscene and troubling.  For example, the paper reports that a board member at a credit union in Indiana received an annual stipend of $93, 109 for working two hours a week on board business.  Other examples of high pay cited by the paper range from $65,000 for a board treasurer in Pennsylvania to the $21,000 that a Wisconsin board chair receives for working ten hours a week.  Not bad for overseeing a not-for-profit organization.  The good news is that credit unions in many states where board member pay is authorized, such as Texas, choose to forgo the option.

Now, what kind of board member can you get in Indiana for $93,000?  I’m thinking of an all-Star lineup including Larry Bird, the venerable retired Senator Richard Lugar and perhaps even Latoya Jackson and some of her brothers.  This type of board would really spice up the annual convention but would do little to aid the credit union cause, and therein lies the dilemna.  Credit unions are not-for-profit member-owner cooperatives overseen by a volunteer board of directors, or so we tell our state and federal representatives.  However, the proliferation of board member pay has turned this truism into a falsehood.  Explaining that most credit unions are run by a volunteer board is kind of like arguing that someone is just a little bit pregnant.

These state level prerogatives make it more difficult for all credit unions, regardless of where they are located, to justify their tax exempt status.  If you don’t think this is true, when you’re gathered around the barbecue tomorrow ask your Uncle Charlie if he thinks it is right that board members of not-for-profits get paid.  Add in the fact that these directors oversee institutions that don’t pay a corporate income tax and see what he thinks about the credit union tax exemption then.

I know, I know.  Why let the white noise of banker opposition keep us from utilizing a tool to attract the best board members possible.  After all, our annual conventions could easily be mistaken for an AARP get together or maybe even a remake of the movie Cocoon in which a group of retired geriatrics suddenly burst to life and start dancing wildly courtesy of an alien life force.  (In my ever so humble opinion it is the great Steve Guttenberg’s best work).

But while it is fun to be cynical, the board members I have met are deeply committed to the movement, and stay informed about the latest trends in the industry.  Don’t mistake their age for lack of commitment or understanding about the importance of the industry as a whole.  No doubt the movement faces a challenge passing on that institutional knowledge and passion to younger generations; but the solution is not to throw up our hands and take away one of the most important distinctions between credit unions and their for-profit counterparts.

CFPB Releases List of Underserved Areas

Many of the key mortgage regulations, including the escrow rule for high cost mortgages which has already taken effect, include certain exemptions from regulatory requirements for mortgages given in underserved areas.  In an effort to help credit unions and banks quickly find out if a mortgage qualifies for these exemptions, the CFPB has released a list of underserved areas on which credit unions can rely when making this determinations.  Two thumbs up for this type of common sense assistance in implementing the mortgage regulations.

Have a Happy Fourth!

Entry filed under: Compliance, Political, Regulatory. Tags: , , , , .

Sexual Orientation and Fair Lending Laws CUs Given Stay Of Execution On Loan Participation Regulations

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Authored By:

Henry Meier, Esq., General Counsel, New York Credit Union Association.

The views Henry expresses are Henry’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 474 other followers