What Chairman Hood’s Pot Pronouncement Means to Your Credit Union

August 12, 2019 at 9:50 am Leave a comment

In an August 5, 2019 interview with the CU Times, Chairman Rodney Hood added another wrinkle to the legal/regulatory framework encasing marijuana banking when he proclaimed that Credit Unions were free to make a business decision about whether or not to offer cannabis banking services. He further explained that NCUA would not penalize these Credit Unions so long as they follow the appropriate BSA requirements along with adequately addressing safety and soundness concerns. While, the Chairman statements are welcomed, there is still much, much more that needs to be clarified when it comes to providing marijuana banking services.

First the Chairman’s comments should be followed up with a Letter to Credit Unions clarifying precisely what NCUA’s stance is. This is necessary because NCUA stance on marijuana banking has been somewhat inconsistent. For example, in 2014 it explained to Credit Unions that they would be permitted to engage in marijuana banking in states where marijuana is legal provided they followed FINCEN’s guidance on marijuana banking. But when Fourth Corner Credit Union in Colorado, a state chartered institution created specifically to provide marijuana banking services, applied for share insurance from the NCUA, the NCUA denied their request. Eventually, the Credit Union sued both NCUA and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas with the Credit Union settling after agreeing to very restrictive terms.

And let’s remember some core issues remain to be resolved regardless of what stance NCUA takes on the issue. Most importantly, even though Congress voted to block federal prosecutors from bringing enforcement actions against institutions providing marijuana services in states where it is legal, marijuana possession remains unequivocally illegal as a matter of Federal law. This would be true even without Jeff Sessions’ decision to revoke the Cole Memorandum, which laid out the conditions under which financial institutions would not be prosecuted for providing banking services to Marijuana related businesses.  This means we are a new Treasury Secretary away from having no Federal guidance as to how marijuana services can be “legally” provided.

Where does this leave your Credit Union? Pretty much in the same place it was a couple of weeks ago. To be sure SAR reports show that many Credit Unions have already decided that the benefits of marijuana banking outweigh the risks. But for those of you who are still gun shy Hood’s announcement, in my ever so humble opinion, without more, should not change your calculus.

Entry filed under: Legal Watch, Regulatory. Tags: , , , , .

Judge Invalidates NY Title Insurance Restrictions; DFS, 10 Other States Start Investigation of Usurious Lending Practices The Most Important Cases of the Year?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authored By:

Henry Meier, Esq., Senior Vice President, General Counsel, New York Credit Union Association.

The views Henry expresses are Henry’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association. In addition, although Henry strives to give his readers useful and accurate information on a broad range of subjects, many of which involve legal disputes, his views are not a substitute for legal advise from retained counsel.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 598 other followers

Archives