Taxi Task Force to NCUA: It’s Time To Get Involved

February 4, 2020 at 9:56 am 1 comment

Hello folks.

On the train back to Albany yesterday during the unofficial National Football Hangover Day, I read this much anticipated report released by the New York City formed task force which recommends solutions to the NYC Taxi Medallion crisis.

The issues surrounding medallion loans have been analyzed so much now that it’s hard to come up with any radical new proposals. To me, the most important impact of the report is that it underscores that NCUA has to get actively involved in working with both NYC and the State Legislature if there is going to be any viable plan created to help drivers holding unaffordable medallion loans. After all, according to the Task Force, NCUA holds approximately $1 billion in Medallion Loans and, if it decides to offload this portfolio en masse, policy makers will lose any ability to play a role in the loan modification process.

As a result the Task Force believes

“… it is imperative that stakeholders work quickly to develop a practical option for medallion owner debt relief. Such relief may involve collaborating with the NCUA with respect to the portfolio of medallion loans it currently owns.”

 

Escrow Litigation Heats Up

I don’t want anyone to tell me that I did not warn them that the days of federally chartered credit unions not having to pay mortgage escrow interest may very well be coming to an end.

As I mentioned in this blog, there is currently litigation, modeled after similar lawsuits in California, alleging that Federally Chartered Banks are no longer exempt from New York’s law requiring mortgage escrow holders to pay interest. Although this litigation does not involve credit unions, the legal logic underpinning the exemption for federally chartered credit unions is virtually identical to that of banks.

On January 30th, lawyers for Bank of America urged a federal court in New York to fast track the appeal of similar litigation in New York. In a letter to the court, the bank noted that a proliferation of cases challenging the escrow exemption “underscore the need” for an expedited appeal.

What does all this mean for you federally charted credit unions that provide mortgages in New York?   While the issue is still being litigated, you should certainly be taking the time to plan for the likelihood of having to pay interest on those mortgage escrows.

Entry filed under: General, Legal Watch, Mortgage Lending, New York State. Tags: , , , , .

Why California’s Privacy Law doesn’t apply to your Credit Union Hood Clarifies NCUA Position on Bank “Mergers”

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Michael Murrock  |  February 4, 2020 at 11:19 am

    We’ve paid dividends on escrow funds as long as we’ve been handling escrow accounts. We see it as yet another source for core shares.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authored By:

Henry Meier, Esq., Senior Vice President, General Counsel, New York Credit Union Association.

The views Henry expresses are Henry’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association. In addition, although Henry strives to give his readers useful and accurate information on a broad range of subjects, many of which involve legal disputes, his views are not a substitute for legal advise from retained counsel.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 653 other followers

Archives